Waist Deep in the Big Muddy?

Hillary has stepped into it this time, waist deep. This story is not going to be laughed off. Bernie is absolutely right in attacking Wall Street for its predatory practices. The bastards there destroyed our economy and stole our future and our children’s future, all with the help of their cronies in Washington. Chief among them, of course, are the Clintons.

Realize that if this had been the 1600’s, they would have gone to the block. Even today, there are many countries in the world who would have had thieves like these summarily executed. Today, in America, the best we could do is to send them to a low security prison. But, with the help of their allies in Washington, not even one of them went to trial, let alone served time. The middle and working classes of this country may finally be prepared to take our country, our economy and our government back from the filthy rich, hopefully at the polling station but, if need be, at the barrel of a gun. Pissing off American working people is never a good idea and people like the Clintons will never understand that.



Playing Both Sides Against the Middle

An interesting consideration. As we all know, most political candidates these days rely on Super PACs to enhance their funding and to do a lot of dirty work on the campaign trail that can be held at a safe distance from the candidate him or herself. And, it is certainly the case that a tremendous amount of campaign funding comes from extremely wealthy individuals and corporations which want to hold some degree of influence over the candidate once they become elected.

This past week, we came to know that Senator Ted Cruz was “loaned” a million dollars from Goldman Sachs. Oddly enough, Goldman Sachs is one of Hillary Clinton’s top contributors. In fact, when you look at where Goldman Sachs has been spending its campaign donation money, you’ll see that it has been fairly evenly split between Republican and Democratic candidates.

How should we see that? Is it the case that Goldman Sachs (which we are using in this example, but you could insert your favorite campaign contributor here) has a political ideology that is both conservative and liberal simultaneously? Probably not. I think it might be fairer to say that Goldman Sachs does not care who wins an election. They care only that they have “stock” in that candidate and can expect to reap dividends in return.

These candidates, whether at a Senatorial, House or Presidential level, are auspiciously “representatives.” But whom do they represent? Many of you know that I am supporting Bernie Sanders. Part of my rationale is that Sanders represents us and does not take campaign contributions from big corporations or donors like the Koch Brothers. This is part of the homework we must all do for ourselves.




Pulling No Punches

Bernie does not pull any punches. He names names. In this case, 18 CEO’s who were signees to a letter to the Wall Street Journal lecturing America about deficit reduction and the need to cut Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are identified as the culprits behind the economic collapse and the recipients of trillions of dollars in bail-outs and hundreds of billions in tax refunds when they paid no corporate taxes whatsoever. And note, three of the eighteen CEO’s are the heads of Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase and Time Warner, all three of which are to be found in the top seven contributors to Hilary Clinton’s campaign. Read this for yourself and follow the money. Then, pass your knowledge on.