In the wake of the most recent “Super Tuesday,” it is time to consider that a revolution may yet be coming to America. The races are not over, by any stretch, but one thing that we have clearly seen is that among all of the candidates who have thrown hats into the ring this election cycle, two have garnered more attention and enthusiasm than any other, Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders. And, while the two are vastly different as men, as political figures, and as representatives of particular economic classes in our society, there is one constant between them. Each is calling for a revolution.
In Sanders’ case, he is calling for a political revolution which involves more and more people becoming involved in the political process, such that the leaders we elect better reflect the desires of the broader base of the population and will work together to point our country in a new direction. His is a revolution based on leveling the playing field for all of us, so that no one economic strata of our society foots the bill for everyone else. Instead, his desire is for the wealthiest members of our society to pay their fair share, for our country to guarantee as a right, decent health care to all Americans, for the greed that has taken over corporate America and Wall Street to be tempered so that working people have a chance to own a decent standard of living, for us to look to the future and provide all of our children the opportunity to become the best and brightest that they can be, because we will be relying on them to take over for us. And he is calling for a nation that has given its young men and women to two decades of purposeless war to finally, give peace a chance.
Trump is calling for a very different kind of revolution. His is based on the idea that our enemies are already in the process of taking over our country from within and without, with the solution that we need to send our immigrant populations home, deny aid to refugees who might be coming instead to attack us, force our economic will upon the world in the form of “great deals” which would strengthen our economy against those of China and third world nations, and secure our borders with a wall which would be visible from space. He points to outsiders and says, “They hate us.” He wants to “bomb the shit out of” our enemies abroad and enter into a database all of the ones at home who might be conspiring against us.
One revolution is about including people in the process and one is about excluding anyone who does not think like him and his. These two candidates have consistently drawn larger crowds than all of the others. That alone speaks to an understanding among our people that some manner of change must come.
What merits this revolution? What is different this cycle or has mysteriously managed to focus all of our attention on something we previously had ignored?
Bernie Sanders points to the rigged system and there has been ample evidence of it. Since the passage of Citizen’s United and the legislated understanding that “corporations are people,” the rise and overt nature of the Super Pacs has become abundantly clear. Aside from Sanders and Trump, all of the other candidates receive their funding in large part from Super Pacs, organizations of wealthy individuals and corporations who choose candidates to support based on their willingness to endorse the agendas of those individuals and corporations. There is an old story about Henry Ford, who once said that people could “have a Model T in any color they wanted, as long as it was black.” As voters, we have come to see that we can vote for any candidate we choose, we just weren’t the ones choosing who ran in the first place.
We have also seen that the mainstream media has attempted to shut out Sanders and his campaign in favor of Hillary the Inevitable and the ever entertaining media darling, Donald Trump. Understanding that 90% of the main stream media in America is owned by six enormous corporations, which lobby and own their own candidates, makes it easy to understand why they want nothing to do with a candidate who can not be bought. And, even the DNC itself, has shown that it is part of that same rigged system, organizing debates to run at times when the fewest number of people would be watching, shutting out voters from the process by arriving without sufficient number of ballots, and disregarding President Obama’s own expressed desire to keep Wall Street money from buying Democratic candidates. When the DNC looks us in the eye and tells us that their Super Delegates exist to make sure that the party is not subject to the will of voters choosing a grass roots candidate, we know the fix is in.
For his part, Trump has asserted time and again that he is self-funding and cannot be bought. Instead, he exemplifies the section of our society doing the buying. He is a classic, self-styled “power broker,” able to cite the law and rationalize why he is not to be bound by it. Rather than come to a fuller understanding of the principles at the heart of our system of government, he deals in expedient and entirely whimsical reasons to thumb our collective noses at those values. His ignorance shall be our strength. His defiant scowl, reason enough. As the world bows to Donald Trump, so shall it bow to America. I am reminded of a line from an old episode of the Firesign Theater, “All for one and all for one. Let’s hear it for me!”
But the foundations of this revolution run far deeper.
What we have come to understand about America since the start of this election cycle is deeply troubling. Where we once thought of our government as sitting at the top of our society, perched like Olympus atop the mountain, we have now come to see that the government is not at the summit of our nation. That is the playground of the wealthiest people and institutions in the country, the same ones who buy the candidates and the elections themselves. Instead, the government serves as a buffer between them and us. The laws are passed to benefit them, to benefit big corporations and big money, to insure that they become bigger still. And in just the same way that a corporation shields, in a legal sense, the owners from the threat of loss due to lawsuit, the government shields them from us. We can replace the government, but we can not replace them or their influence on our nation.
Karl Marx once called religion, “the opiate of the masses,” and John Lennon sang that “they’ll keep you doped on religion and sex and TV.” What we have come to see is that on certain fundamental levels, nothing in our country ever changes. Bones are thrown our way, to be sure. The Affordable Care Act promises that we will all be able to purchase health insurance. But just like something called a Smart phone, it is neither smart nor affordable.
More often than not, those who own and run the country find ways to pit us against each other. The rise for example, of evangelical christianity to a point where some 25% of the country’s population identifies itself as evangelical, directly corresponds to the time frame over which this country has become so polarized that Republicans and Democrats have become the Hatfields and the McCoys. Through a calculated fear mongering aimed at an element of the religious right, evangelicals have been taught to believe that they are under attack from all sides. Their understandable response has been to rise up in opposition of this perceived threat. And that keeps everyone’s attention focused like Don Quixote on dragons that are not really there at all.
The endless battle over issues like abortion rights, gay marriage, gun control, corporate taxation, the role of the bible in our government and judicial system, even the birthplace and citizenship of the president, are all issues designed to divide us. Like a magician’s sleight of hand, they serve the purpose of distracting our eyes from the real issues. Today, our magicians are all in politics. And what is politics but the art of convincing people that you are saying one thing, when in reality you are saying something completely different?
The still recent and lingering (despite what Washington tells us) recession has illustrated what the real issue is; in America, the very wealthy are becoming more and more so, while the rest of us slip a little further down the slope with each year. When the wealthiest fifteen individuals in the country have seen their earnings grow by $170 billion dollars in two years, and the wealthiest 1% of the country controls more wealth than the bottom 90%, all while they pay a lower percentage of their income in taxes than your average secretary, one must see that there is something fundamentally unjust in our system. When the richest nation on the planet sees 40% of its population with no savings, living hand to mouth on the edge of poverty, worried that the next rise in health insurance or the cost of energy, might be the straw that breaks the camel’s back, something is fundamentally unjust in our system. And when our politicians stare stone-faced at us and say that providing health care as a right to our people or free college tuition to our students, is impossible, despite the fact that much of the industrialized world does exactly that, something is fundamentally unjust in our system.
After all, is ours not a system of justice? For so long, we have been taught that ours is not a democracy (where the mob can rule), ours is a republic, where there are laws which bind everyone, high and low. Prove it. The truth has become all to obvious; there is a class of people in this country who are above the law. As Bernie Sanders pointed out, of the people on Wall Street who destroyed our economy, stole the retirement savings of countless Americans, and bankrupted cities to the point where they could not pay their retired workers the pensions they had bought and paid for, not a one went to jail. Not a one was even indicted.
And well we remember that even on the off chance that a scum bag like Marc Rich could be charged or convicted, the system, in the form of then President Bill Clinton, would pardon him and absolve him of his crime. When Hillary Clinton laughs at the camera and tells you that she will never be indicted, you can believe her. It matters not that there is or is not evidence against her that would merit an indictment. What matters is that like Achilles, she has been dipped in the River Styx by the ruling class, and is nearly impervious.
But Sanders and Trump each know her Achilles’ heel.
And so a revolution may yet be coming to America.
Where establishment candidates like Clinton and Cruz are content to blame each other’s party, whilst wrapped in the flag or clutching their bibles, Sanders and Trump, like the majority of the voting public, know that the apple doesn’t rot far from the tree. The system is broken, perhaps hopelessly so, and the engine of government needs to be completely overhauled or even replaced.
It is then up to us to decide. Which revolution shall we choose?
Bernie Sanders has been careful to say, “I can’t do this alone.” He needs the help of all of us, joining in the political process. He understands the gridlock that is Washington and just how easy it would be for the Republicans to block his efforts as they have blocked President Obama’s. But there is a difference this time around. It just so happens that 88% of the House of Representatives is up for re-election this year. If the grass roots movement is really paying attention, the chance is there for us to throw the bastards out, and make a real change, from within. It will be hard, for certain, but if it is truly the will of the people, and the people choose to stand together, it can be done. Unless, of course, the DNC does not print enough ballots, or the Super Pacs run enough smear campaigns.
Then, we might be left with Trump. Why it has taken so long for him to terrify the Republican party, I do not know. But terrify them, he has. Today, there is even talk of running an independent candidate against Trump in the general election. It would not be because that candidate might win; it is simply because that candidate might split the ticket and cause both to lose. Many Republicans would rather see Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders in office, than to endure a Trump revolution.
It has been very interesting to me to see all of the comparisons of Trump to Adolph Hitler. It is easy to make them, based on his attacks on minorities, outsiders and a particular religious group. His posturing and scowl may owe more to Mussolini, but the comparison to Hitler is certainly warranted. What worries me more is the style of his revolution. In some ways, it has a greater resemblance to that of the Bolsheviks.
When the Bolsheviks overthrew the Czar and took control of Imperial Russia, they had before them the task of bringing the revolution to all corners of the empire. So, while they could easily have exiled the Czar and his family to any one of a number of european countries (the royal families were all inter-related by birth or marriage), they chose instead to line them up against a wall and have them shot. Years later, they acknowledged that this was done for one simple reason. After the execution, there would be no turning back.
Trump’s rhetoric is increasingly backing him and his adherents into a corner. The cult of Donald Trump allows for no errors of judgement, no statements of remorse, no admission of fallibility. Any such event could topple him like a house of cards. Instead, his revolution is targeted specifically at those who can not defend themselves. His followers have been groomed for a generation to believe that they are already under attack and they have armed themselves to the teeth to defend their god, their freedom and their guns.
Would Trump do something to advance the agenda of his revolution from which there could be no return? If it was good for business, he just might. He just might start a third world war with the Islamic world, because our country would then be mobilized into full industrial productivity, full employment for the war effort, and a booming economic forecast. Think not? Remember that World War II brought this country out of the Great Depression.
If this election is bringing revolution to America, our saving grace may be that it appears we will at least have a choice. We can overhaul the engine from within or we an drive off the lot in a shiny new convertible, paid for in the misery of generations to come. If we make the peaceful revolution impossible, we might make the violent revolution inevitable.